h of these critical locations. This list of failures, along with the list of root causes, will become the list of those items to be changed in the next plan.

In the last year, however, a new recommendation for a more effective after action review process has come to light. The recommen

There are as many ways to write an after action report as there are hospitals that are now required to perform disaster drills and write after action reports analyzing the performance of the institution following a disaster or a disaster exercise. Since there are 5,756 licensed hospitals in the United States, there are 5,756 different ways that are currently employed to write the after action review. At most institutions, after action reviews are written by a committee between 12 and 18 individuals, managers and supervisors who in addition to their regular duties, have been charged with analyzing the performance of their departments during an adverse event or disaster exercise.

When these individuals meet, they review the disaster plan and the performance of each division of the organization seeking to identify those areas where they enjoyed success. This list of successes will represent what the committee will keep as part of all future plans.

The committee will then review performance to determine where the plan failed. From this list of failures, they will perform a “root cause analysis” seeking to determine why the failure occurred at each of these critical locations. This list of failures, along with the list of root causes, will become the list of those items to be changed in the next plan.

In the last year, however, a new recommendation for a more effective after action review process has come to light. The recommen

he United States, there are 5,756 different ways that are currently employed to write the after action review. At most institutions, after action reviews are written by a committee between 12 and 18 individuals, managers and supervisors who in addition to their regular duties, have been charged with analyzing the performance of their departments during an adverse event or disaster exercise.

When these individuals meet, they review the disaster plan and the performance of each division of the organization seeking to identify those areas where they enjoyed success. This list of successes will represent what the committee will keep as part of all future plans.

The committee will then review performance to determine where the plan failed. From this list of failures, they will perform a “root cause analysis” seeking to determine why the failure occurred at each of these critical locations. This list of failures, along with the list of root causes, will become the list of those items to be changed in the next plan.

In the last year, however, a new recommendation for a more effective after action review process has come to light. The recommen

ed with analyzing the performance of their departments during an adverse event or disaster exercise.

When these individuals meet, they review the disaster plan and the performance of each division of the organization seeking to identify those areas where they enjoyed success. This list of successes will represent what the committee will keep as part of all future plans.

The committee will then review performance to determine where the plan failed. From this list of failures, they will perform a “root cause analysis” seeking to determine why the failure occurred at each of these critical locations. This list of failures, along with the list of root causes, will become the list of those items to be changed in the next plan.

In the last year, however, a new recommendation for a more effective after action review process has come to light. The recommen

of successes will represent what the committee will keep as part of all future plans.

The committee will then review performance to determine where the plan failed. From this list of failures, they will perform a “root cause analysis” seeking to determine why the failure occurred at each of these critical locations. This list of failures, along with the list of root causes, will become the list of those items to be changed in the next plan.

In the last year, however, a new recommendation for a more effective after action review process has come to light. The recommen

h of these critical locations. This list of failures, along with the list of root causes, will become the list of those items to be changed in the next plan.

In the last year, however, a new recommendation for a more effective after action review process has come to light. The recommendation does involve spending a small amount of money. The one best technique for maximizing your disaster plan is to buy index cards.

During a disaster or a disaster exercise, every individual involved in the operation of the hospital, regardless of their role or job, receives an index card. On the front of the index card, these employees will write the one thing that they saw that went extremely well during the disaster or disaster drill. On the back of the card, these employees will write the one key failure that they saw during the course of the disaster operation or disaster exercise.

Following the disaster or disaster drill, when it is time to perform the after action review the index cards will be collected and taken to the review committee. The hospital now has thousands of eyes that have critiqued hospital operations.

When the committee meets, they will perform their usual analysis of those things that went well and those areas of failure. They will still perform their usual root cause analysis attempting to identify the reasons for all failures. Then they will turn to the index cards.

If the committee is very, very lucky,