ame bursting” of images and angles I hath observed said chair. Additional thoughts on this, read about Eagles and sight, memory and observations:

http://www.worldthinktank.net/art125.shtml

We know that bees and other insects also use similar methods and memory, they can remember their Bee Keepers face and associate it with a p

Many say that man cannot build computers, which can duplicate the human brain, because the thoughts, memories and images in the brain are spiritual. Since God made man’s brain this way, there is no way that scientists, researchers or artificial intelligence gurus in academia can recreate that.

One recent think tanker, a biblical scholar and devout Christian wished to make a point on this issue and he stated: “Imagine something in your mind, imagine… say, a chair, this chair that you’re a visualizing is not physical, it is your thought, it is spiritual.”

This was met with skepticism from another think tank member who tried to explain his point of view to the Christian Gentleman and stated:

“Well the chair in my mind would be a cache of memory or a “frame bursting” image in the memory, which was formed from a chemical reaction at a time it was imprinted. It is a representation of a chair. A digital picture is an image encoded by ones and zeroes, but it is not spiritual, yet there it is:

http://www.pitt.edu/~bookctr/giftsapparel/gradgifts/Chair.jpg

It is a representation of a chair in the virtual world. It exists, but it is not spiritual or any more spiritual than the chair in my mind. Of course mine is somewhat more detailed than this particular chair. And I can spin the chair in my head based on memories or “frame bursting” of images and angles I hath observed said chair. Additional thoughts on this, read about Eagles and sight, memory and observations:

http://www.worldthinktank.net/art125.shtml

We know that bees and other insects also use similar methods and memory, they can remember their Bee Keepers face and associate it with a po

olar and devout Christian wished to make a point on this issue and he stated: “Imagine something in your mind, imagine… say, a chair, this chair that you’re a visualizing is not physical, it is your thought, it is spiritual.”

This was met with skepticism from another think tank member who tried to explain his point of view to the Christian Gentleman and stated:

“Well the chair in my mind would be a cache of memory or a “frame bursting” image in the memory, which was formed from a chemical reaction at a time it was imprinted. It is a representation of a chair. A digital picture is an image encoded by ones and zeroes, but it is not spiritual, yet there it is:

http://www.pitt.edu/~bookctr/giftsapparel/gradgifts/Chair.jpg

It is a representation of a chair in the virtual world. It exists, but it is not spiritual or any more spiritual than the chair in my mind. Of course mine is somewhat more detailed than this particular chair. And I can spin the chair in my head based on memories or “frame bursting” of images and angles I hath observed said chair. Additional thoughts on this, read about Eagles and sight, memory and observations:

http://www.worldthinktank.net/art125.shtml

We know that bees and other insects also use similar methods and memory, they can remember their Bee Keepers face and associate it with a p

ristian Gentleman and stated:

“Well the chair in my mind would be a cache of memory or a “frame bursting” image in the memory, which was formed from a chemical reaction at a time it was imprinted. It is a representation of a chair. A digital picture is an image encoded by ones and zeroes, but it is not spiritual, yet there it is:

http://www.pitt.edu/~bookctr/giftsapparel/gradgifts/Chair.jpg

It is a representation of a chair in the virtual world. It exists, but it is not spiritual or any more spiritual than the chair in my mind. Of course mine is somewhat more detailed than this particular chair. And I can spin the chair in my head based on memories or “frame bursting” of images and angles I hath observed said chair. Additional thoughts on this, read about Eagles and sight, memory and observations:

http://www.worldthinktank.net/art125.shtml

We know that bees and other insects also use similar methods and memory, they can remember their Bee Keepers face and associate it with a p

http://www.pitt.edu/~bookctr/giftsapparel/gradgifts/Chair.jpg

It is a representation of a chair in the virtual world. It exists, but it is not spiritual or any more spiritual than the chair in my mind. Of course mine is somewhat more detailed than this particular chair. And I can spin the chair in my head based on memories or “frame bursting” of images and angles I hath observed said chair. Additional thoughts on this, read about Eagles and sight, memory and observations:

http://www.worldthinktank.net/art125.shtml

We know that bees and other insects also use similar methods and memory, they can remember their Bee Keepers face and associate it with a p

ame bursting” of images and angles I hath observed said chair. Additional thoughts on this, read about Eagles and sight, memory and observations:

http://www.worldthinktank.net/art125.shtml

We know that bees and other insects also use similar methods and memory, they can remember their Bee Keepers face and associate it with a positive or negative. As a matter of fact this is common through out all living species, some suspect bacteria, microbe colonies too. I am beginning to agree with them on that as well. Lots of proof, additionally this is why fractal camouflage works so well and there are issues to with Stealth if you think deep on it; another article of interest in this discussion:

http://worldthinktank.net/wttbbs/index.php?s=9b451ac4154de74b2c8f9107cec7bdec&showtopic=1597&st=0&#entry4128

What do you see when you look at the clouds? A chair? Could be or perhaps you see Jesus in your French Toast and wish to bid on it on Ebay? Have to each his own, but I am hungry for more that Toast with a French flare to it;”

http://worldthinktank.net/wttbbs/index.php?showtopic=304

Do you have thoughts on man’s mind and brain and god’s plan for it? Do you think that either of these think tankers made rational arguments pro or con the use of technology in duplicating the human brain? If you have thought about such things, then we would sure like to hear your point of view and perspective? Think on this in 2006.