medical “Treatment”) the basic worth of your claim will have been drastically reduced, as the amount of your “Special Damages” and thus drastically reduce the true value of your claim. At that point the adjuster will argue that the “Treatment” portion of your medical bills that’s “directly related” to the severity of your injury, therefore it’s what truly reflects (and measuThe value of a personal injury claim has a direct relationship to the amount of your medical bills. Why? Because a claim with medical bills of $500.00 is worth three to five times more than a claim with $100.00, or less. And that’s a fact of life in the world of insurance claims.

The adjuster will reason if you were hurt badly enough to run up $500.00 in medical expenses than it’s correct to assume that your injuries must be substantial. But, if you see your chiropractor or physician only once or twice, and your final bills are in the vicinity of $100.00, that adjuster will assume you weren’t hurt too seriously.

DEMAND THAT ALL YOUR MEDICAL BILLS BE PAID: The adjuster may try to disallow a substantial part of your total medical expenses which he contends doesn’t qualify as “medical” in character. He’ll often attempt to divide your medical costs into two arbitrary parts - - “Diagnostic” and “Treatment”. In the “Diagnostic” category he’ll include items such as ambulance and emergency room costs, costs of X-rays, and other diagnostic procedures, plus visits to specialists. And the rest (principally costs of the hospital and regular office visits to doctors, physical therapy and medication) will be termed "Treatment”. The items that are categorized as “Diagnostic” expenses are the bills the adjuster would like to disallow as not being “Medical” types of activities.

He may try to do this because with a differentiation (between what is “Diagnostic” and what is supposedly true medical “Treatment”) the basic worth of your claim will have been drastically reduced, as the amount of your “Special Damages” and thus drastically reduce the true value of your claim. At that point the adjuster will argue that the “Treatment” portion of your medical bills that’s “directly related” to the severity of your injury, therefore it’s what truly reflects (and measur

s than it’s correct to assume that your injuries must be substantial. But, if you see your chiropractor or physician only once or twice, and your final bills are in the vicinity of $100.00, that adjuster will assume you weren’t hurt too seriously.

DEMAND THAT ALL YOUR MEDICAL BILLS BE PAID: The adjuster may try to disallow a substantial part of your total medical expenses which he contends doesn’t qualify as “medical” in character. He’ll often attempt to divide your medical costs into two arbitrary parts - - “Diagnostic” and “Treatment”. In the “Diagnostic” category he’ll include items such as ambulance and emergency room costs, costs of X-rays, and other diagnostic procedures, plus visits to specialists. And the rest (principally costs of the hospital and regular office visits to doctors, physical therapy and medication) will be termed "Treatment”. The items that are categorized as “Diagnostic” expenses are the bills the adjuster would like to disallow as not being “Medical” types of activities.

He may try to do this because with a differentiation (between what is “Diagnostic” and what is supposedly true medical “Treatment”) the basic worth of your claim will have been drastically reduced, as the amount of your “Special Damages” and thus drastically reduce the true value of your claim. At that point the adjuster will argue that the “Treatment” portion of your medical bills that’s “directly related” to the severity of your injury, therefore it’s what truly reflects (and measu

es which he contends doesn’t qualify as “medical” in character. He’ll often attempt to divide your medical costs into two arbitrary parts - - “Diagnostic” and “Treatment”. In the “Diagnostic” category he’ll include items such as ambulance and emergency room costs, costs of X-rays, and other diagnostic procedures, plus visits to specialists. And the rest (principally costs of the hospital and regular office visits to doctors, physical therapy and medication) will be termed "Treatment”. The items that are categorized as “Diagnostic” expenses are the bills the adjuster would like to disallow as not being “Medical” types of activities.

He may try to do this because with a differentiation (between what is “Diagnostic” and what is supposedly true medical “Treatment”) the basic worth of your claim will have been drastically reduced, as the amount of your “Special Damages” and thus drastically reduce the true value of your claim. At that point the adjuster will argue that the “Treatment” portion of your medical bills that’s “directly related” to the severity of your injury, therefore it’s what truly reflects (and measu

he hospital and regular office visits to doctors, physical therapy and medication) will be termed "Treatment”. The items that are categorized as “Diagnostic” expenses are the bills the adjuster would like to disallow as not being “Medical” types of activities.

He may try to do this because with a differentiation (between what is “Diagnostic” and what is supposedly true medical “Treatment”) the basic worth of your claim will have been drastically reduced, as the amount of your “Special Damages” and thus drastically reduce the true value of your claim. At that point the adjuster will argue that the “Treatment” portion of your medical bills that’s “directly related” to the severity of your injury, therefore it’s what truly reflects (and measu

medical “Treatment”) the basic worth of your claim will have been drastically reduced, as the amount of your “Special Damages” and thus drastically reduce the true value of your claim. At that point the adjuster will argue that the “Treatment” portion of your medical bills that’s “directly related” to the severity of your injury, therefore it’s what truly reflects (and measures) your “Pain and Suffering”.

Don’t let him get away with that! If he should attempt to pull this on you tell him, “It’s absurd and illogical to separate medical expenses into two arbitrary categories and designate one as “Diagnostic” and the other as “Treatment”. Each area works hand-in-hand with the other in medical practice. I can’t get properly treated without being diagnosed!

He’ll gulp, because he knows what you say is true and that will usually be the end of such nonsense on his part.

“PERMANENT” AND/OR “TEMPORARY” DISABILITY: In discussing “Disability”. it’s important to develop a working knowledge of these two legitimate concepts. Commonly, personal injuries are classified as either “Permanent” or “Temporary”. These two terms are used basically to describe the anticipated duration of an injury, and not its degree of severity! Thus, if an injury is conceived as one which would continue throughout the remainder of an individuals lifetime, it’s said to be “Permanent” in nature. Conversely, if it’s a reasonable probably that the claimant will attain a full or complete recovery (within some future period) the injury is classified as “Temporary" - - regardless of how severe or extensive the injury might otherwise appear.

TOTAL AND/OR PARTIAL DISABILITY: Another common classification of “Disabilities” will relate to whether they are considered to be “Total” or “Partial”. These terms refer to the actual extent of the claimant’s injuries, regardless of whether th